On false (rape or other) accusations: I feel personally offended, as
a woman, when the premise is put forth by other women that somehow,
because of my gender, I’m required to take a woman’s side in every
single instance where “he said / she said” exists. The sad reality is
that should a woman decide she regrets a sexual encounter - an encounter
that was completely* consensual at the time- she can decide that it was
assault or rape, and destroy the life of someone else. Worse still is
the fact that this same “opportunity” is not afforded to men, at all,
ever.
Men who allege sexual assault are almost always disbelieved,
mocked, belittled. It’s a demeaning and oppressive double standard.
Why aren’t men allowed the opportunity to be helped, comforted,
consoled after being sexually assaulted? Insisting that “men can’t be
raped” or anything of the sort is a disgusting instance of double
standard, and is yet another bastardization of one of the original tenets of feminism - EQUALITY. Feminism, originally, was the
desire for equality, right? What is equal about one gender being
allowed to allege sexual assault and receive comfort, support and be
believed in those allegations, but not the other gender? The war on
cis-het men really needs to stop. It’s disgusting.
A strong,
successful woman I recently spoke with about feminism pondered
feminism's role and meaning in her life. She asked, "If I am not a
feminist, who is??" Here's the thing - today's "feminism", as we
generally, colloquially understand it to be (and let me plainly state, I
am no scholar of the ideology) has been hijacked and corrupted, perhaps
purposefully or perhaps as a matter of time and societal evolution.
Today's feminism isn't what it started out as.
I often
contemplate American society in terms of evolution, both broadly and in
the context of a human life span (probably synchronous with my own
lifespan thusfar and its likely endpoint). The 60s, in hindsight (I
wasn't there, but society is akin to the Titanic - it doesn't change
course all that quickly), were collectively younger, wilder,
idealistic teenage years. The 50s, more child-like, more naive, more
trusting of government, authority, etc. The 70s were...a mess, ha ha -
an era replete with the awkwardness of "finding ourselves". The 80s
were perhaps that launch-point we all get to (if we're lucky), where
we're well into our 20s, maybe early 30s, and we've achieved cruising
altitude. After that, the 90s - young, but not quite as young, still
naive, but not as naive, and most importantly, the last moments of a
SocMed-free world. Continuing onward, the 2000s came and with it both
the end of everything we knew and the beginning of everything we will
know. The entire game has changed.
What was once "it would be
nice to be allowed to have a career, an education, be something more
than a brood mare" (which was absolutely a valid and worthy ideal) has
morphed into a terrible, "She-Lady Man Haters"Club, complete with
decoder rings, secret handshakes and shunning if you dare stray outside
the acceptable dogma. My hope is that it's a pendulum of sorts - that
it will settle into a more inclusive equilibrium. Men today seem
(rightfully) angry at decades of being infantilized, feminized, subtly
told they're horrible, unfeeling, rapey ogres, and I think they're
really quite tired of that narrative.
Women have also been fed a
false narrative - that they are both strong, powerful, "better than
boys" warriors AND special, perfect princesses. None of those things
are compatible in any way, and everyone is a mess because societal
gender roles that in any way mimic biological ones have become a dirty,
verbotten thing. Everyone is completely confused and it's readily
apparent and palpable across all SocMed. I think the "special, perfect
princesses" is really the root of the problem, where current feminism is
concerned. It's the opposite of empowering, it's actually quite
patronizing, yet all we hear about is "the evil patriarchy!!".
I
think the overarching problem today is the adoption of the victim
mindset. Somehow, we went from a manly-man, suck-it-up, don't cry ya big
baby society to "everyone gets a trophy, no one ever has to feel any
pain or inferiority and you don't have to break a sweat and try at all,
because that's [insert oppressive buzzword here]". It went off the
rails. You are probably an admirable, beautiful, intelligent woman, and
there is likely no reason for you to feel anything but pride in who and
what you are.
"Feminism" is not a badge, it is not an achievement. It is
an ideology, and it has been co-opted by many over the years and used
as a device of sorts (if that's even the right word). I hope you keep
asking the questions, I hope that you never back down from being
courageous. I know you know far better than I do the narrative, the
propaganda of it all that forms the narrative that ripples through the
zeitgeist these days.
* The definition of "completely" is somewhat
ambiguous. I don't deny the fact that there are situations where a
seducer takes advantage of a drunk girl and while I do believe we are
responsible for our actions, including the decision to get hammered at a
bar and go home with some guy, I also believe that the responsibility
for actions and choices should be shouldered equally with both the
seducer AND the seducee. Also applicable to both is that part of being a
fucking ADULT is using some common sense, not putting yourself in a
vulnerable, potentially dangerous situation, and not dragging a drunk
girl home just because you can AND taking ownership of your mistakes.
Shit like having ruphies slipped into your drink doesn't count here, and
in such an instance, the blame shifts squarely onto the shoulders of
the piece of shit doing the drugging.
No comments:
Post a Comment